Search for: "D.J. Close"
Results 1 - 20
of 109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2017, 6:33 am
Close enough means no lawsuit. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 6:35 am
I have light skin, close to 6 foot, easily angered and computer technology is what I live for. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 12:05 pm
., No. 07-56277 (4-12-10) (Trager, D.J., joined by Kleinfeld and Tallman). [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 12:14 pm
D.J.; dissent by Berzon).This is a computer search case redux. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 2:50 pm
Fletcher and Zouhary, D.J.).The defendant sent a letter when he was running for Congress as a Republican. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:43 pm
Tucker, No. 09-10319 (4-15-11) (Callahan with Gould and England, D.J., E.D. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 1:47 pm
Noriega-Perez, No. 10-50501 (2-1-12) (Tallman with Fernandez; partial dissent by Moore, D.J.).It is hard to find renters now a-days. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 8:55 am
Camou, No. 12-50598 (12-11-14)(Pregerson with Fisher and Gwinnett, D.J.). [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:13 am
D.J.).The defendant tried to export defense articles without a license. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:44 pm
Fletcher with Kleinfeld and Duffy, D.J.). [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 12:34 pm
Begay, No. 09-10249 (9-20-10) (Bybee with Schroeder and Gonzalez, D.J.). [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:46 am
Boykin, No. 13-10248 (Lynn, D.J., with Hawkins and Rawlinson). [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 5:50 am
Meshell, 34 FLW 41, Fla, L & L, 800.04(4) not D.J. violation when oral sex and vaginal penetration in one single criminal episode can be more than one count, elements of different proof and and therefore distinct criminal actsEvans, 34 FLW 150, 4th DCA, tampering with evidence-evidence that def threw or dropped cocaine rock in sand and ofcs were unable to find, without further evidence of specific intent to tamper with or conceal the evidence was insufficient to find anything more… [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:17 pm
Graf, No. 07-50100 (7-7-10) (Tallman with O'Scannlain and Block, D.J.). [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 8:11 am
"... [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 7:54 am
But as the Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Pooler and Reiss [D.J.]) writes:McCulloch presents no evidence from which a reasonable jury could find that the Defendants harbored animus against Hispanics, or that animus played a role in the restrictions imposed on McCulloch’s subdivision. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 11:25 am
It is true, the Court of Appeals (Chin, Katzmann and Castel [D.J.]) says, that "an officer would lack probable cause if the arrestee's entitlement to a statutory exemption were so plain that no reasonable officer could think otherwise. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 7:22 am
Plaintiff invites the Court of Appeals to extend the Golden Rule to summations when they address liability, but the Court of Appeals (Cabranes, Raggi and Vilardo [D.J.]) will not do so.Barrella argues that Hardwick’s counsel engaged in “golden rule” argumentation during closing, which asks jurors to place themselves in the position of a party. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
Cal, the vast majority of D.J. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:55 pm
D.J. for DC; concurrence by Hug). [read post]
